Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nandi Bhatia, Acts Of Authority/Acts Of Resistance: Theater And Politics In Colonial And Postcolonial India, reviewed by Aparna Dharwadker Loren Kruger, Post-Imperial Brecht: Politics And Performance, East And South, reviewed by Antony Tatlow Harry J. Elam, Jr., The Past As Present In The Drama Of August Wilson, reviewed by Keith Clark Christopher Bigsby, ed., The Cambridge Companion To David Mamet, reviewed by Jeanne-Andrée Nelson Kenneth Krauss, The Drama Of Fallen France: Reading La Comédie Sans Tickets, reviewed by Catherine Masson Maria Shevtsova, Dodin And The Maly Drama Theatre: Process To Performance, reviewed by Peta Tait Robert Cross, Steven Berkoff And The Theatre Of Self-Performance, reviewed by Annette Pankratz Ric Knowles Reading The Material Theatre., reviewed by Willmar Sauter Petra Kuppers, Disability And Contemporary Performance: Bodies On Edge, reviewed by Sheila C. Moeschen Thomas Fahy And Kimball King, eds., Captive Audience: Prison And Captivity In Contemporary Theatre, reviewed by James Thompson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.464 | 0.447 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".