MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252636014 · doi:10.1504/ijpti.2016.083690

Development of an objective freshness index for a variety of Mediterranean eggplant

2016· article· en· W4252636014 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Ngadi, Arturo A. Mayorga Martínez, Timothy Schwinghamer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolanumHorticultureMediterranean climateMathematicsAgricultureBotanyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this work was to develop a non-subjective freshness index (If) for a Mediterranean variety of eggplant (Solanum melongena L. cv. Traviata). Eggplants were obtained from local agricultural sources and stored under controlled environment conditions. Storage temperature was und to have an effect on If, while the agricultural source and the degree of exposure to light did not affect If. Nonlinear functions modelled If against weight loss (WL), peel gloss loss (GL), surface stiffness loss (SL), density ratio minus one (DRMO), and storage period (in h). The best model for predicting If of eggplant was a function of SL (R2adj =0.98). Stepwise regression identified hyperspectral wavelengths that will predict If at 10°C (R2adj =0.46) and 27°C (R2adj =0.78). If can be used to estimate eggplant quality, therefore future work will develop freshness indices for other eggplant varieties stored under a range of temperature conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Postharvest Technology and InnovationSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207