MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2016· article· W4252637690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Crowley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBourgeoisieColonialismArchitectureHegemonyHistoryGreenwichNarrativeArt historySubject (documents)PoliticsLawArtArchaeologyPolitical scienceLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Philadelphia Country House: Architecture and Landscape in Colonial America by Mark Reinberger and Elizabeth Mclean John E. Crowley The Philadelphia Country House: Architecture and Landscape in Colonial America. By Mark Reinberger and Elizabeth Mclean. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015. 430 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, index. $69.95.) For the importance of its subject, the intelligence of its argument, and its visual quality, this is the best book on the architectural history of British colonial America. Its first half provides a richly authoritative transatlantic analysis of the "bourgeois country house" that gained architectural hegemony in Philadelphia. Based on a comprehensive series of individual estates' histories, the second half is an even more impressive narrative of country house building. Reinberger and McLean unnecessarily freight their interpretation with the overdetermining "bourgeois," when "regent," "notable," "patrician," or even "would-be aristocratic" would less anachronistically identify the patrons of the estates studied. Country house building in Philadelphia began with the first generation of colonists, who followed the lead of founder William Penn. The builders were nearly all Quakers, and they intended their creations to be "long-term, even permanent retreats from the city where they could practice God's work, agriculture, and live frugally and plainly" (209). Diverse early designs belied this unity of intent, but the colony's second generation of builders, still predominantly Quakers, adopted "a more standard house type, the compact, or double-pile house": "two and a half stories, five to seven bays, hipped roof, brick, central-hall Georgian plan" (209–10). Here, Philadelphia's "bourgeois" residents drew on designs fashionable among the English gentry, and they gave a corresponding priority to agriculture. This gentrification of Philadelphia intensified in the 1730s and 1740s, with estates built by the proprietor, Thomas Penn (no Quaker), Governor James Hamilton (no bourgeois), and William Peters (a lawyer for rentiers and eventually head of the Penns' Land Office), but now with Palladian-styled aristocratic villas modeled on those being built up-Thames from London. Penn's Springettsbury was "the first predominantly ornamental pleasure garden in Pennsylvania" (234). It even had a deer park, a landscape redundancy in deer-infested North America but the height of conspicuous spatial consumption according to aristocratic traditions in the mother country. The architectural elegance of these pleasurable retreats proclaimed their builders' "artistic, intellectual, and epicurean" refinement (265). In their wake came a flood of more modest imitators. Even people in Germantown built such houses "as newcomers distanced themselves from the older town and its inhabitants" (264). Such distancing, however, often synthesized vernacular traditions in highly original ways, most notably with John Bartram's estate. Socially, the story culminates where it began, with Governor John Penn's Lansdowne, built in the 1770s and described breathlessly by John Adams in a 1795 letter to Abigail: "very retired, but very beautiful—a splendid house, gravel walks, shrubberies, and clumps of trees in the English style—on the banks of the Schuykill" (327). [End Page 234] The Johns Hopkins University Press has invested resources appropriate for a fine coffee table book on a first-rate piece of scholarship. Its generous format allows solid amounts of text, large-scale illustrations, and subsidiary comments and details to be integrated on single pages. The paper stock has just the right balance between low reflection for readability and glossy finish for precise images. The buildings come to life visually, with over two hundred figures—architectural plans and elevations, natural history illustrations, maps, landscape drawings and prints, and photographs—nearly two dozen of them in color. Mark Reinberger took most of the present-day photographs, which provide superb images that precisely develop the analysis. One can only hope that other presses will take this book as a model for publishing visual culture history. John E. Crowley Dalhousie University Copyright © 2016 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.039
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pennsylvania Magazine of History and BiographySame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207