MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252637939 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.4346

Représentations sociales

2015· book-chapter· fr· W4252637939 on OpenAlexaff
Élisabeth Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and Wildlife
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suivre la trajectoire sociale des idées scientifiques : tel est le projet du « public understanding of science », qui s’étend de l’analyse de la littératie à celles de la communication scientifique et des controverses (voir Controverse et Communication publique des sciences). Ces traditions de recherche s’opposent parfois sur le statut du savoir « profane » qu’elles prennent pour objet, tantôt conçu comme distorsion des savoirs experts (voir Scientisme et politique), tantôt comme résistance c...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.023
Scholarly communication0.0140.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207