MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252671680 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11093

Evolutionary Neural Network-Based Obstacle Avoidance for a Planetary Exploration Rover

2015· dissertation· en· W4252671680 on OpenAlexaff
Yingying Ye

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraverseObstacle avoidanceComputer scienceMotion planningArtificial neural networkPath (computing)Mobile robotArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)ObstacleRobotReal-time computingGeographyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During space missions, a planetary exploration rover is subject to two main communication issues that are inherent to the distance and orbital difference between Earth and the target planet, the communication transmission delay and the limited transmission window.Besides, the computational resources are restricted onboard the vehicles for space missions.Based on these facts, the rover is desired to traverse on the target planet efficiently with fewer human commands and less computational needs, as well as with an autonomous decision-making scheme -allowing the rover to perform autonomous science.The proposed autonomous path planning system presents a set of genetically evolved neural network controllers for local path planning of a mobile robot.Travelling environments are partitioned into three categories according to distribution patterns of targets and obstacles.Each evolved network is adopted to direct the rover travelling in one category of partitioned environments achieving a sequence of targets with obstacle avoidance.With a set of pre-learned networks, the rover would be adaptable to traverse in new environments of specific category.Input to the network is the range and bearing data measured from current position of the rover to surrounding obstacles and the approaching target.It outputs a turning angle ratio processed to be direction of the rover for next move.Genetic algorithm is used to obtain the evolved network by developing behavior strategies through evolutionary iterations.Simulation results indicate that evolved neural controller can adapt to novel environments and generate satisfying path for the rover in a computationally economic manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207