MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252696540 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14656599.v1

Mitigation of torsional vibration in large mill drive train system using state feedback control method

2021· preprint· en· W4252696540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)VibrationTorsional vibrationRobustness (evolution)Linear-quadratic-Gaussian controlEngineeringTorqueServomotorFrequency domainServomechanismInput shapingControl systemVibration controlControl engineeringComputer scienceOptimal controlMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Torsional vibration limits the speed loop response of industrial drives and servo systems, deteriorating the transient response to speed commands and load disturbances. This thesis presents a damping method for torsional vibration produced by compliant components between the motor and the load in rolling mill applications. The proposed damping algorithm can solve the limitation of the classical damping approaches due to the large values of system time delay. The proposed algorithm is based on State Feedback Control (SFC) method with modified Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) approach using a torque sensor as a feedback element. The result of modification is a low order single-input single-output compensator that mitigates the torsional vibration without affecting the speed loop. The verification of the design and the dynamic performance is accomplished by using time and frequency domain responses with real rolling mill system parameters. The performance of step commands, mitigation of torsional vibration and robustness to parameter variation is satisfied by using the proposed method. Also disturbance rejection performance is improved through load torque compensation. The experiment is performed on a 0.8 KW system with 24 Hz mechanical resonant frequency. Simulation and experimental results from the experimental system verify the proposed damping algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207