MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252719357 · doi:10.7202/1021484ar

Convention collective — Validité de certaines clauses — Caractère légal d'un arrêt de travail destiné à les respecter

2014· article· en· W4252719357 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Labor and Employment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionArbitrationLawCarry (investment)Political scienceWork (physics)BusinessEngineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. A clause in a labour agreement, according to which an employer undertakes not to require an employee to work on domestic nonunion shop goods, or on goods imported from a specified country is perfectly legal and valid. 2. A refusal on the part of employees to carry out work which an employer would require them to carry out in violation of such a clause would not constitute an illegal stoppage of work The Association of Millinery Manufacturers vs The United Hatters Cap and Millinery Workers International Union, Local No. 49; Judge Emile Trottier of the Court of Sessions of the Peace, single arbitrator. A.L. Stein, Q.C., counsel of the Association, and Me Philip Cutler, counsel for the Union, Private arbitration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industriellesSame topicInternational Labor and Employment LawFrench-language works237,207