MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4252749382 · doi:10.1057/9781137428257_8

Conclusion

2014· book-chapter· en· W4252749382 on OpenAlexaff
Louisa Hadley

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPrime ministerFocus (optics)Political scienceRelation (database)HistoryLawPolitical economySociologyComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hadley closes the volume by considering the continued appearance of news items in relation to Thatcher. In contrast to the focus on the personal in the wake of Thatcher’s death, more recent reports seem to focus on the political — in terms of both Thatcher’s actions while Prime Minister and her legacy in contemporary politics. Hadley argues that this is in part the result of the release of previously sealed documents from Thatcher’s time in office; however, she speculates that it is perhaps the beginnings of a more critical assessment of Thatcher that will focus on the politics rather than the person.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks→Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US→French-language works237,207→