Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peter Horn. Die Garne der Fischer der Irrsee: Zur Lyrik von Paul Celan, reviewed by joshua dittrich Jill Scott. A Poetics of Forgiveness: Cultural Responses to Loss and Wrongdoing, reviewed by alice a. kuzniar Caspar Battegay. Das andere Blut: Gemeinschaft im deutsch-jüdischen Schreiben 1830–1930, reviewed by katja garloff Margarethe Heukäufer. ‘Und es gibt so wenig Menschen.’ Das kurze Leben des Künstlers Peter Kien, reviewed by rosa pérez zancas Gaby Pailer. Hedwig Dohm, reviewed by ruth-ellen boetcher joeres Veronika Fuechtner. Berlin Psychoanalytic: Psychoanalysis and Culture in Weimar Republic Germany and Beyond, reviewed by jill scott Malkmus, Bernhard F. The German Pícaro and Modernity: Between Underdog and Shape-Shifter, reviewed by todd kontje Joseph Garncarz and Annemone Ligensa, eds. The Cinema of Germany. 24 Frames, reviewed by james m. skidmore Katie Sutton. The Masculine Woman in Weimar Germany, reviewed by maria euchner
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.406 | 0.392 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".