MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252795853 · doi:10.1016/s1464-2859(12)70065-2

ClearEdge Power wins CSA certification, hits industry FC-1 standard

2012· article· en· W4252795853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel Cells Bulletin · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationListing (finance)Product certificationEngineeringScalabilityPower (physics)Engineering managementManufacturing engineeringBusinessComputer scienceManagementFinanceEconomicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oregon-based ClearEdge Power, which manufactures scalable, continuous onsite power systems, reports that its outdoor ClearEdge5™ system has received CSA certification and listing to the well established ANSI/CSA Americas FC-1 standard. The CSA certification assures major retailers, distributors, regulators and consumers that the ClearEdge5 has passed rigorous testing to meet the US and Canadian fuel cell industry standards for safety and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1500.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuel Cells BulletinSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207