Are Morphometrical Approaches Appropriate to Establish Size at Maturity for Male American Lobster, Homarus Americanus?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study on the size at maturity of male American lobster (Homarus americanus) has traditionally been done based on a linear relationship between chelae size vs. body size assuming that a sharp change in slope occurs at onset of maturity. We analyzed this sexual dimorphism by standard log-linear transformations and bivariate allometric plots as well as by multivariate Principal Components Analysis (PCA) in order to verify the validity of this approach for determining size at maturity. These analyses showed that onset of maturity cannot be detected efficiently by claw morphometry because this secondary sexual character gradually changes from early juvenile stages, contrary to what has been believed. Observation of the presence of spermatozoa in the vasa deferentia (gonadal maturity) showed that 50% gonadal maturity occurred at 49.8 mm of carapace length for male lobster from the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. However, gonadal maturity does not necessarily correspond to the ability to mate (behavioral maturity) in many crustacean species. Therefore, further studies are needed to assess the behavioral maturity to determine the size at maturity for male lobsters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it