MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252839690 · doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0629

Digital Humanities

2017· other· en· W4252839690 on OpenAlexaff
Anabel Quan‐Haase, Kim Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital humanitiesField (mathematics)HumanitiesKey (lock)Library scienceBig dataMedia studiesData scienceSociologyComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This entry provides a brief overview of the field of the digital humanities. The entry discusses the main tenets of the digital humanities and shows its historical origins. It also discusses key current trends including big data, text analysis, and the development of digital humanities centers. The entry concludes with an examination of future developments in the field of digital humanities, such as information visualization and public digital humanities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheorySame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207