MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252868466 · doi:10.3901/jme.2021.22.237

Research on Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Intelligent Car-following Control and Energy Management Strategy for Hybrid Electric Vehicles

2021· article· en· W4252868466 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolin Tang, Jiacheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningEnergy managementControl (management)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringReinforcementControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceEnergy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

摘要: 以研究智能混合动力汽车控制技术与深度强化学习算法为目标,首先,在两辆混合动力汽车的跟驰环境中,针对领航车提出一种基于深度值网络算法的能量管理策略,实现深度强化学习对发动机与机械式无级变速器的多目标协同控制;其次,针对跟随车建立基于深度强化学习的分层控制模型,实现面向智能混合动力汽车的上层跟车控制与下层能量管理;最后,仿真验证分层控制模型的有效性。结果表明,基于深度强化学习的跟车控制策略具有理想的跟踪性能;同时,基于深度强化学习的能量管理策略在领航车与跟随车中均实现了较好的燃油经济性;此外,基于深度强化学习的能量管理策略输出每组控制动作的平均时间为1.66 ms,保证了实时应用的潜力。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mechanical EngineeringSame topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207