MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252926935 · doi:10.1081/lcss-200036499

Ammonia Volatilization Loss from Surface-Broadcast Urea: Comparison of Vented- and Closed-Chamber Methods and Loss in Winter Wheat?Summer Maize Rotation in North China Plain

2004· article· en· W4252926935 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaohui Wang, Xuejun Liu, Xiaotang Ju, Fusuo Zhang, S. S. Malhi

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceVolatilisationAmmonia volatilization from ureaAmmoniaAgronomyUreaPoaceaeWinter wheatMollisolChemistrySoil waterFertilizerSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ammonia (NH3) volatilization is an important pathway for fertilizer nitrogen (N) loss from soil and is also a major source of air and environmental pollution. On calcareous soils in North China Plain, application of N fertilizer in the form of urea under intensive cropping with winter wheat (Triticum aestvum L.) and summer maize (Zea mays L.) rotation can lead to serious NH3 loss. The objective of this study was to compare a modified vented-chamber method with the traditional closed-chamber method to measure NH3 volatilization loss under laboratory and field conditions and to determine in situ NH3 volatilization in the field from surface broadcast urea at 0, 120, 240, and 360 kg N ha−1 rates to each crop (for winter wheat, one-half at sowing and the other half at the elongation growth stage; for summer maize, one-half at the 3-leaf and the other half at the 10-leaf growth stage) in a winter wheat and summer maize rotation at the northern edge of North China Plain from October 1998 to September 1999. Urea was surface applied after irrigation before sowing, or prior to irrigation during the growing season. Compared to the closed chamber method, the vented chamber method was found to be simpler in structure, easier to operate, more suitable for in situ determination of NH3 volatilization in the field, and had higher recovery of emitted NH3 (99.5 vs. 70.8%). For surface broadcast urea after first irrigation prior to sowing of winter wheat, the NH3 volatilization rate reached, a maximum on the second to fifth day after application. Total NH3 loss from soil during the October 8 to November 18, 1998, period was 2.9, 4.8, 10.5, and 35.7 kg N ha−1 at the 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha−1 rates, respectively. When urea was top-dressed prior to irrigation at the elongation growth stage of the winter wheat in midspring, NH3 loss was relatively low (i.e., 1.5, 2.1, 2.4, and 2.7 kg N ha−1 at 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha−1 rates, respectively). The NH3 loss from urea for the entire winter wheat–growing season accounted for 2.1, 3.6, and 9.5% of the applied N at 120, 240, and 360 kg N ha−1 rates, respectively. For summer maize where urea was top-dressed at the 3-leaf and 10-leaf growth stages, the NH3 volatilization rate increased more quickly and maximized on the first or second day after N application. During the summer maize–growing season, total NH3 loss from urea accounted for 5.6, 4.8, and 4.9% of the applied N at 120, 240, and 360 kg N ha−1 rates, respectively. Based on the results of this study, total NH3 loss was estimated to range from 163,000 to 477, 200 Mg of N from soil in a winter wheat–summer maize rotation in North China Plain. Of these, about 68,400 to 382,600 Mg of N loss were from the N fertilizer surface applied as urea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207