MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Board

2014· paratext· en· W4252950258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLegal and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudenceLawPoliticsState (computer science)SociologyPublishingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2014), "Editorial Board", Special Issue: Law and the Liberal State (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 65), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720140000065015 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Gad Barzilai Political Science University of Washington, USA and Tel Aviv University, Israel Paul Berman Law George Washington University, USA Roger Cotterrell Legal Theory Queen Mary College, University of London, UK Jennifer Culbert Political Science Johns Hopkins University, USA Eve Darian-Smith Global Studies University of California, Santa Barbara, USA David Delaney Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought Amherst College, USA Florence Dore English University of North Carolina, USA David Engel Law State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Anthony Farley Law Albany Law School, USA David Garland Law New York University, USA Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller Political Science University of Hawaii, USA Laura Gomez Law University of California, Los Angeles, USA Piyel Haldar Law Birkbeck College University of London, UK Thomas Hilbink Open Society Institute, USA Desmond Manderson Law McGill University, Canada Jennifer Mnookin Law U.C.L.A., USA Laura Beth Nielsen Research Fellow American Bar Foundation, USA Paul Passavant Political Science Hobart and William Smith College, USA Susan Schmeiser Law University of Connecticut, USA Jonathan Simon Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley, USA Marianna Valverde Criminology University of Toronto, Canada Alison Young Criminology University of Melbourne, Australia Book Chapters Special Issue: Law and the Liberal State Studies in law, politics and society Special Issue: Law and the Liberal State Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Board Trading Truth for Legitimacy in the Liberal State: Defending John Rawls’s Pragmatism The Neoliberal State’s Janus Faces of Law Jury Nullification: An Illiberal Defense of Liberty Gays in the Military: Toward a Critical Civil Rights Account Health Care and the Disembodied Politics of American Liberalism Nomos and Native American Narratives: The Duality of Law in the Liberal State

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0160.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3920.376

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207