MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252955715 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11941

Changing Tides: An Exploration of Time and Place

2017· dissertation· en· W4252955715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wendy Richards

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense of placePerspective (graphical)Intervention (counseling)Identity (music)ArchitectureCollective memoryEnvironmental ethicsCultural landscapeGeographyAestheticsSociologyPolitical scienceVisual artsArchaeologySocial scienceArtPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores ways in which the built environment contributes to collective memory and informs a sense of place within the cultural landscape of Moncton, New Brunswick. The intention is to respond to the current changes in the landscape from a cultural perspective as the city attempts to remedy environmental and ecological issues that have transpired as a result of human intervention.By preserving the infrastructure that contributed to the current conditions of the site, while integrating new architectural elements, the proposal draws awareness to the history of the site, celebrates the identity of the place, and encourages a new perspective on the changing landscape. Through this, new spaces for cultural activities emerge to re-establish a lost connection between the city and the river.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.026
Scholarly communication0.0150.013
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207