Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Mots du bled. Cration contemporaine en langues maternelles, les artistes ont la parole, Dominique Caubet (ed.), (2004) Paris: L'Harmattan, 237 pp., ISBN 2-7475-6249-2 (pbk), 20 Colonial Cinema and Imperial France 19191939: White Blind Spots, Male Fantasies, Settler Myths, David Henry Slavin (2001) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, xv + 300 pp., ISBN 0-8018-6616-2 (hbk), 32 Vietnamese Voices: Gender and Cultural Identity in the Vietnamese Francophone Novel, Nathalie Huynh Chau Nguyen (2003) DeKalb, IL: Southeast Asia Publications, 239 pp., ISBN 1-891134-26-4 (pbk), 19.95 Francophone Postcolonial Studies: A Critical Introduction, Charles Forsdick and David Murphy (eds), (2003) London: Arnold, 305 pp., ISBN 0-340-80801-2 (hbk), 50, 0-340-80802-0 (pbk), 16.99 Of Suffocated Hearts and Tortured Souls: Seeking Subjecthood through Madness in Francophone Women's Writing of Africa and the Caribbean, Valrie Orlando (2003) La Lanham, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Lexington Books, 197 pp., ISBN 0-7391-0563-9 (pbk), 25 Le Creuset des cultures: la littrature antillaise, Jean Faustman (2004) New York: Peter Lang, 138 pp., ISBN 0-8204-6732-4 (hbk),39, 54.95, 55 Cacosme littraire. La fonction du personnage amricain dans le roman hatien partir de 1915, Jacques-Raphal Georges (2004) New York: Peter Lang, 179 pp., ISBN 0-8204-6196 (hbk), 36.40, 61.95, 52 Portrait du dcolonis arabo-musulman et de quelques autres, Albert Memmi (2004) Paris: Gallimard, 168 pp., ISBN 2070773779 (pbk), 15
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.571 | 0.503 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".