MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252981081 · doi:10.4000/lisa.2917

Introduction

2004· article· en· W4252981081 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Garrait-Bourrier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue LISA / LISA e-journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce numéro de La Revue LISA/LISA e-journal se concentre sur la valeur et l’authenticité du témoignage historique lorsqu’il est véhiculé par une forme littéraire subjective, qu’il s’agisse du témoignage autobiographique né de l’expérience vécue ou bien de l’interprétation subjectivée du témoignage par la fiction littéraire. Le champ scientifique que cette thématique se propose de couvrir est celui des études culturelles américaines des XIXe et XXe siècles directement en lien avec les écritures ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4040.203

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue LISA / LISA e-journalSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207