MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252984899 · doi:10.4133/1.2923651

Imaging Earthquake Scarps and Tsunami Deposits in the Pacific Northwest, USA

2006· article· en· W4252984899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2006 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault scarpGeologyGround-penetrating radarSubsidenceTransectArchaeologySeismologyGeomorphologyOceanographyTectonicsRadarGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A considerable amount of interdisciplinary research has been conducted during the past several decades to establish evidence for prehistoric earthquakes along the Cascadia margin of the United States and Canada. Several methods have been proposed to aid in this process including the mapping of earthquake induced effects (e.g. scarps) along the coastline and the mapping of paleotsunami deposits within low‐lying coastal wetlands of the Pacific Northwest. As these subsurface features depend on local geomorphology, there is a need to accurately identify and characterize them along the coastal plain. The major objectives of our experiments were to test if ground penetrating radar (GPR) would be able to detect these features in the subsurface, earthquake induced scarps and tsunami deposits, and provide images so that their thickness and internal stratigraphy could be determined. GPR transects were collected with both a pulseEKKO 100 and 1000 GPR systems using various antennae frequencies ranging from 50 to 450 MHz. Our test localities included Long Beach, Washington and Seaside, Oregon. Near Long Beach, a series of 8 coseismic subsidence induced scarps have been previously mapped. With this project we were able to collect a higher resolution grid (225 MHz) over a scarp and visualize the associated geomorphic features in three dimensions. At Seaside, the 1700 AD tsunami inundated the low‐lying area via channelized flow and pour‐overs which left several deposits including a 10–30 cm thick sand sheet. This fan has been mapped using GPR and in association with the sediment cores the tsunami sand sheet was identified. From data collected with higher frequency antennae (450 MHz), the internal layers of the sand sheet including cross beds can be resolved. Based on the interpretation of the GPR data one can hypothesize that when mega earthquakes occur along the Cascadia margin the associated coastal depositional and/or erosional processes can be both imaged and inferred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it