MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The MILO (MEK inhibitor in low-grade serous ovarian cancer)/ENGOT-ov11 study: A multinational, randomized, open-label phase 3 study of binimetinib (MEK162) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or persistent low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum.

2015· article· en· W4253021856 on OpenAlexaff
Bradley J. Monk, Rachel N. Grisham, Christian Marth, Susana Banerjee, Felix Hilpert, Robert L. Coleman, Éric Pujade-Lauraine, Sandro Pignata, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Amit M. Oza, Josep M. del Campo, Martin K. Oehler, Adam James, Janna Christy‐Bittel, Emma Barrett, Adam P. Boyd, Ignace Vergote

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMEK inhibitorInternal medicineOncologyClinical endpointKRASChemotherapyCancerMAPK/ERK pathwayClinical trialKinaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS5610 Background: Low-grade serous (LGS) carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneum are a unique subset of serous carcinomas for which current therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal) have demonstrated limited efficacy. KRAS or BRAF mutations, which activate the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway, are present in many LGS carcinomas. Binimetinib is a potent inhibitor of MEK1/2, a key component of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, and has demonstrated activity in other disease settings where dysregulation of this pathway is present. Methods: This is a 2-arm, open-label, 2:1 randomized Phase 3 study of binimetinib vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan) in patients with LGS carcinomas. Eligible patients must have LGS carcinoma that is recurrent or persistent following at least 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy and no more than 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, and must have RECIST v1.1-defined measurable disease confirmed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Prior to randomization, confirmation of LGS diagnosis is required. Patients are eligible regardless of RAS/RAF mutational status; however, tumor tissue will be retrospectively analyzed for mutations in RAS/RAF and other genes. Prior treatment with a MEK inhibitor or BRAF inhibitor is prohibited. Randomization is stratified by last platinum-free interval and number of prior systemic therapy regimens. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival as determined by the BICR; secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, quality of life and pharmacokinetics of binimetinib. Binimetinib is administered 45 mg BID orally. Patients receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover is permitted from physician’s choice chemotherapy to binimetinib upon BICR-confirmed progression. This study will enroll 300 patients worldwide (NCT01849874). Clinical trial information: NCT01849874.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→