MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253025645 · doi:10.4021/jmc21w

Acquired Factor V Inhibitor Developing After Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2011· article· en· W4253025645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maeda

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemostasis and retained surgical items
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous ethanol injectionHepatocellular carcinomaPartial thromboplastin timeCirrhosisProthrombin timeGastroenterologyInternal medicineLiver functionFactor IXFresh frozen plasmaChronic hepatitisCoagulationSurgeryImmunologyPlateletVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of an 80-year-old man who showed an abrupt-onset prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) one month after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The patient had chronic hepatitis (not liver cirrhosis), but the liver function had been preserved before PEIT. Supplementation of vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma could not restore the coagulation disturbance, and the following examination revealed the existence of factor V inhibitors. Because the patient was positive for hepatitis C virus and concurrent with advanced chronic renal failure, a careful follow-up without any aggressive therapy, such as administration of steroids and other immunosuppressants, was selected. The PT and APTT had been gradually normalized in the following observation period for several months, and no serious event related to bleeding tendency had occurred. This is the first report of factor V inhibitors arising after PEIT that spontaneously diminished by no additional therapy. J Med Cases. 2011;2(3):132-137 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc214w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicHemostasis and retained surgical itemsFrench-language works237,207