Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last 10 years new information has been published providing a better understanding of the risk factors, mechanism and prevention of aminoglycoside ototoxicity. The use of a higher dose and once-daily intravenous administration of aminoglycosides has shown clinical effectiveness with no increase in ototoxicity when compared to traditional regimens. An enhanced susceptibility to aminoglycoside cochlear toxicity has been linked to an A-to-G substitution in location 1555 of the mitochondrial ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA). More recently, a second mutation involving a thymidine deletion in the 12s ribosomal RNA gene has been identified which can predispose patients to aminoglycoside auditory toxicity. Experimental evidence in animals has indicated that reactive oxygen species are one of the most important factors responsible for the development of aminoglycoside ototoxicity. The animal data has suggested a decrease in hearing loss induced by aminoglycosides when antioxidant or iron chelator therapy is given concomitantly with aminoglycoside antibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it