MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253027088 · doi:10.1017/9781787442917.008

1945

2018· book-chapter· en· W4253027088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After four years of toil and numerous premieres, Martinů had built up an enviable position in the American musical world. Yet with the end of the war, his plan was to return to Prague, where he expected to be received with a new level of respect. Once in Prague, he knew things would be different personally. With the reopening of postal communications in August 1945, he learned of his mother's death the previous year and that the previous month, his best friend Stanislav Novák—who had dealt with unspeakable tragedies during the war— had also died. In September 1945, he received a telegram from Vaclav Holzknecht (1904–88), then the director of the Prague Conservatory, asking if he would be interested in a teaching position in the master class for composition. Seeing his lifelong goal finally at hand, he replied right away that he would be prepared to accept such an offer and returned to New York City from Cape Cod to make plans. He anticipated that things would move quickly from this point forward, but he became discouraged as he received no further news. What he did not realize was that—as part of Nejedlý's house-cleaning measures as the interim Minister of Education and Culture— Holzknecht had been relieved from his position as conservatory director. Also contributing to the silence from Prague was the reorganization of the music education system, resulting in the launch of the tertiary level Musical Academy of Performing Arts (HAMU) the next academic year. An anomaly in his career was the fact that, after returning to New York City, he took a five-month break from composing before beginning work on his Fifth Symphony in February 1946. By this time, he had received an offer to teach at Tanglewood for the coming summer, and—unwilling to jeopardize his musical standing in the United States—he accepted the offer. Now, to protract his residence in America, he needed to change his status from endangered intellectual to immigrant, which required him to exit and reenter the country. This he resolved by traveling to Quebec in March 1946.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3560.221

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityFrench-language works237,207