MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anthropometry

2018· other· en· W4253059531 on OpenAlexaff
Warren M. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropometryPsychosocialProxy (statistics)Environmental healthPsychologyGerontologyGeographyMedicineStatisticsMathematicsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropometry provides one of the most portable, least‐invasive measures of health and has long been used by biological anthropologists to document patterns of human well‐being. In addition, these simple measures are predictive of an individual's future well‐being. It is known that genes strongly influence growth, but their effect is mediated by environmental factors such as diet, disease, and psychosocial stress. As such, anthropometry provides an excellent proxy measure of the environment in which one lives. Anthropometric data are inexpensive to collect and analyze. Anthropometry is not limited to contemporary populations. This tool has been used by anthropologists to track changes in health over long periods of time and to better understand the environmental challenges faced by our ancestors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Biological AnthropologySame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207