CNJ volume 54 issue 1 Cover and Back matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but principal de 1'Association canadien-The principal aim of the Canadian Linguisne de linguistique est de promouvoir 1'etude tic Association is to promote the study of de la linguistique au Canada.De plus am-linguistics in Canada.Information concernpies informations au sujet de 1'association ing the association and the journal is availet de la revue sont disponibles sur le site able on the CLA website: web de 1'ACL: www.chass.utoronto.ca/-cla-aclLa cotisation, qui donne droit a l'abon-Membership fees, which include a subnement a la Revue canadienne de lin-scription to the Canadian Journal of Linguistique, ainsi qu'a la soumission de guistics, as well as the right to give papers communications au congres annuel de at the annual general meeting of the associ-1'association, s'eleve a 65 $ par annee pour ation, are $65 a year for regular members, les membres ordinaires, a 25 $ pour les etu-$25 for student members with proof of studiant(e)s qui peuvent faire la preuve de leur dent status, and $75 for institutional memstatut et a 75 $ pour les membres institu-bers.Fees should be sent to: tionnels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.847 | 0.755 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".