Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Olanzapine/fluoxetine for treatment‐resistant depression? Adding an atypical antipsychotic to treatment with an SSRI may –or may not –be effective in treatment‐ resistant depression, according to two studies reported from the USA ( J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68:224‐36). The paper reports two eight‐ week trials comparing olanzapine plus fluoxetine with both drugs as monotherapy in 605 patients for whom previous treatment (including fluoxetine) was unsuccessful. The primary endpoint was the change in Montgomery‐Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). In one trial, there was no difference in MADRS scores between the groups, with reductions of 9.4‐11.0 from a mean baseline score of 30.0. In the second, the combination reduced MADRS score significantly more than either drug alone (14.5 vs 8.6 for fluoxetine and 7.0 for olanzapine). The difference remained statistically significant in a pooled analysis. The combination was associated with a greater increase in total cholesterol levels than either drug but the frequencies of other ADRs such as weight gain were similar for the combination and olanzapine. CBT cuts tricyclic adverse effects Adding cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to treatment with imipramine reduces the frequency of adverse reactions (ADRs) and treatment discontinuation in patients with panic disorder, say US investigators ( Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:273‐5). During six months of treatment, ADRs typical of tricyclic anti‐ depressants were rated as no worse than mild. Nevertheless, CBT plus imipramine was associated with significantly less severe fatigue/weakness, dry mouth and sweating than imipramine alone. Thirteen per cent of patients taking imipramine alone discontinued treatment during the first three months due to ADRs; in those receiving combined treatment, 3 per cent discontinued during this phase and a further 8 per cent did so during treatment maintenance. The authors acknowledge that CBT may have reduced symptoms associated with panic disorder that were perceived as ADRs but say their findings deserve further study. Psychotropic drugs in breast milk Three new studies have provided reassuring data about the safety of certain drug treatments for women who are breastfeeding. In the first of two Australian studies ( Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:371‐5), four women taking dexamphetamine 15‐45mg (median 18mg) daily for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were nursing one infant each; the children were within acceptable weight limits and had developed normally. Levels of dexamphetamine in milk were three times higher than in maternal plasma, giving an absolute dose to the infant of 21µg per kg per day, or 6 per cent of the adult dose. In three blood samples from the infants, dexamphetamine was undetectable in one and present at levels of 6 and 14 per cent of therapeutic concentrations in the other two. The authors say the findings support cautious use of dex‐ amphetamine during lactation but caution that longer‐term effects are unknown. The second study ( Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:322‐7) involved eight women taking mirtazepine at a median dose of 38mg daily. The milk:plasma ratio was 1.1 for the parent drug and 0.6 for its active metabolite. Of four samples from the infants, mirtazepine was detected in only one at a level of 1.5µg per litre. No adverse effects were reported and the authors suggest that mirtazepine could be used safely in breastfeeding women. USA specialists have reported on infant exposure to lithium ( Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:342‐5). In 10 women taking an average lithium dose of 850mg daily and with an average trough serum level of 0.76mmol per litre, the concentration of lithium in breast milk was 0.35mmol per litre and infant serum concentrations averaged 0.16mmol per litre. Overall, there was no evidence of abnormal renal or thyroid function in the infants, though levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were slightly raised in several infants. The authors say their findings are reassuring for women who have to take lithium while breastfeeding. Beta‐blockers reduce stroke severity Increased sympathetic activity occurs after acute stroke. It is associated with a poor neurological prog‐nosis and, experimentally, beta‐ blockers have been shown to reduce post‐stroke neurological deficits. In an observational study, US neurologists have now explored the impact of beta‐blockers on stroke outcomes ( Neurology 2007;68:509‐14). Of 111 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke, the 22 taking a beta‐blocker were broadly similar to those receiving other standard therapies except for a higher incidence of symptomatic ischaemic heart disease and a higher frequency of prior stroke. Use of a beta‐ blocker was associated with reduced stroke severity (according to the Canadian Neurologic Scale), even after adjustment for ethnicity, use of other drugs (statins, aspirin, warfarin), previous lacunar stroke and heart disease. Patients taking beta‐blockers therefore have less severe stroke. In this study, beta‐blocker use was associated with lower cardiac sympathovagal tone but other contributory mechanisms may include reduction of acute inflammation, inhibition of thrombin formation or modulation of blood glucose. Cannabis for HIV sensory neuropathy Smoking cannabis reduces pain associated with neuropathy in patients with HIV to an extent comparable with that achieved by conventional analgesics, according to a study from California ( Neurology 2007;68:515‐21). Fifty‐five patients with HIV and confirmed painful neuropathy were randomised to use of cigarettes containing cannabis (3.6 per cent tetrahydrocannabinol, THC) or placebo (THC removed). Patients smoked one cigarette three times a day for five days, following a uniform puffing procedure to stan‐ dardise the dose. Twenty five patients withdrew from the study, mostly because they could not tolerate the assessment procedure for acute pain. Among the remainder, more patients smoking cannabis had at least a 30 per cent reduction in pain severity (52 vs 24 per cent) compared with baseline. The median reduction in self‐assessed chronic neuropathic pain scores was twice as great with cannabis than with placebo (34 vs 17 per cent). Adverse effects were more frequent with cannabis and included sedation, disorientation, confusion and dizziness, but no one stopped treatment as a result. Cannabis had no analgesic effect against acute pain. Essential fatty acids and self‐harm Patients with a recent episode of self‐harm have lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL‐cholesterol and n‐3 and n‐6 essential fatty acids (EFAs) than controls with no psychiatric history, psychiatrists in Ireland have shown ( Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:118‐22). They randomised 49 patients presenting after an act of self harm to treatment with placebo or EFAs (eicosapentaenoic acid 1.2g daily plus decosahexaenoic acid 0.9g daily), in addition to usual psychiatric care ( Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:118‐22). After 12 weeks, treatment with EFAs was associated with significantly improved scores of depression compared with placebo and with more patients achieving a treatment response or remission (reductions of 50 or 70 per cent in rating scores). Fewer patients taking EFAs reported suicidal ideation (though the difference fell slightly short of statistical significance) and per‐ceived stress. However, the frequency of self‐harm events was similar in the two groups and there were no differences in measures of impulsivity and aggression. A larger randomised trial is now warranted, the authors say. Other drugs affect Alzheimer's disease decline London investigators have observed differences in the rate of deterioration in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease associated with drugs prescribed for chronic medical conditions ( J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:233‐9). Among 224 patients aged over 65 years who were living in the community, those treated with an antipsychotic or an hypnotic/anxiolytic were almost three times more likely to have deterioration of Alzheimer's disease (assessed by the Global Deterioration Scale) compared with those who were not taking these drugs. The combination of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine was associated with a nearly four‐fold increased risk. By contrast, statins and ACE inhibitors were associated with substantially lower risks of deterioration of one‐third and one‐eighth respectively; this compared with a risk reduction of a half for drugs licensed specifically for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Safety alert for lamotrigine? Neurologists from Norway have flagged a possible complication of treatment with lamotrigine –sudden cardiac death ( Acta Neurol Scand 2007;115:199‐203). Noting that lamotrigine may affect cardiac potassium cu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".