MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253103226 · doi:10.4095/219889

Mine Tailings Characterization Using PROBE Data (Preliminary Results)

2002· report· en· W4253103226 on OpenAlexaffabout
Junfang Shang Junfang Shang, K Staenz, J Lévesque, Philip J. Howarth, B Morris, L Lanteigne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsCharacterization (materials science)Mining engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acid Mine Drainage (AMD), caused by mine tailings, poses an environmental threat. AMD control is a major challenge facing the mining industries worldwide. An important initial step towards the reclamation of mine tailings sites is to identify the presence of sulphide-rich minerals and their spatial distribution. This study investigated the potential of hyperspectral PROBE data for mine tailings characterization over the Copper Cliff's tailings site in northern Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that PROBE data could provide information on locating oxidation zonations of the tailings. More importantly, it revealed that library mineral spectra could replace the scene-derived endmember spectra to unmix the PROBE image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207