MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heliox inhalation therapy for bronchiolitis in infants

2010· reference-entry· en· W4253105342 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Michel Liet, Thiérry Ducruet, Vineet Gupta, Gilles Cambonie

Bibliographic record

VenueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2010
Typereference-entry
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchiolitisHelioxRelative riskInhalationAnesthesiaRespiratory distressRandomized controlled trialPediatricsConfidence intervalIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute viral bronchiolitis is associated with airway obstruction and turbulent gas flow. Heliox, a mixture of oxygen and the inert gas helium, may improve gas flow through high-resistance airways and decrease the work of breathing. OBJECTIVES: To assess heliox in addition to standard medical care for acute bronchiolitis in infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 2), which includes the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009), EMBASE (June 2009), LILACS (May 2009) and the NIH web site (May 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of heliox in infants with acute bronchiolitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We pooled data from individual trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials involving 84 infants under two years of age with respiratory distress secondary to bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and requiring paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) hospitalisation. We found that infants treated with heliox inhalation had a significantly lower mean clinical respiratory score in the first hour after starting treatment when compared to those treated with air or oxygen inhalation (mean difference (MD) -1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.98 to -0.33, P = 0.006, n = 69). There was no clinically significant reduction in the rate of intubation (risk ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% CI 0.41 to 4.56, P = 0.60, n = 58), in the need for mechanical ventilation (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.38, P = 0.86, n = 58), or in the length of stay in a PICU (MD = -0.15 days, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.61, P = 0.69, n = 58). No adverse events related to heliox inhalation were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that the addition of heliox therapy may significantly reduce a clinical score evaluating respiratory distress in the first hour after starting treatment in infants with acute RSV bronchiolitis. Nevertheless, there was no reduction in the rate of intubation, in the need for mechanical ventilation, or in the length of PICU stay. Further studies with homogeneous logistics in their heliox application are needed. Such studies would provide necessary information as to the appropriate place for heliox in the therapeutic schedule for severe bronchiolitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrench-language works237,207