MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4253112205 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/38/2659

Porous Graphene Layers on Pt Catalyst for Long-Term Stability of Fuel Cell Electrode

2016· article· en· W4253112205 on OpenAlexaff
Heeyeon Kim, Alex W. Robertson, Jamie H. Warner, Sang Ouk Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGrapheneNanotechnologyElectrolyteSupercapacitorCarbon nanotubeCarbon fibersElectrolysis of waterChemical engineeringElectrodeElectrolysisComposite materialElectrochemistryChemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of various energy technologies, much interest is focused on the feasibility and efficiency study of energy devices such as fuel cells, batteries, supercapacitors and water electrolysis systems. Among them, polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC), which convert hydrogen into electric energy with zero emission of pollutants, is one of the most promising environmentally friendly technologies. Despite innumerable studies for more than half a century, degradation of the key component, membrane electrode assembly (MEA), is still a big obstacle for the commercialization of PEFC system. For the high performance and long-term stability of Pt/C electrode catalyst, the agglomeration of Pt particles and dissolution or detachment of Pt particles from carbon support have to be improved. For this purpose, we adopted a new shape of nano-carbon material for the surface modification of Pt catalyst. Graphene has been an attractive two-dimensional carbon allotrope having large surface area and electronic conductivity. Graphene also shows high flexibility and mechanical strength so that it can be used for large number of applications such as flexible display or printable electronics, etc [1-2]. In most cases, people need large-area graphene films with little or no defect for high thermal and electronic conductivity. Also, people need to transfer the as-prepared graphene film for each application. All of these processes are not easy or simple, and they are also labor-intensive processes. However, in the case of catalysis, porous graphene films can be synthesized via very simple one-step process and can be used as effective protective layers for Pt catalysts. In this study, we developed porous graphene films in order to improve the long-term stability of Pt catalysts maintaining the high performance of them. The graphene films were synthesized by single-step vaporization process, where the number of graphene layers and the defects in their structure are manipulated by temperature and composition of the precursors. In this process, the amounts of structural defects, pyridine was simultaneously introduced to the vaporization process, which is much easier and cost-effective compared to the conventional NH3-treatment at high temp [3]. Consequently, our Pt/C catalysts coated with porous graphene films showed similar initial activity compared with the commercial catalysts (Pt 40wt%, Johnson Matthey) showing more than 150% higher long-term stability [4]. [1] A.K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Mater. 6 (2007) 183. [2] X. L. Li, G. Y. Zhang, X. D. Bai, X. M. Sun, X. R. Wang, E. Wang and H. J. Dai, Nature Nanotech. 3 (2008) 538. [3] Y. Wang, Y. Shao, D. W. Matson, J. Li and Y. Lin, ACS nano 4(4) (2010) 1790. [4] H. Kim, A. Robertson, S. O. Kim, J. M. Kim and J. H. Warner, ACS nano 9(6) (2015) 5947.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→