MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253120237 · doi:10.7146/mag.v17i4.66571

Kronik

2004· article· da· W4253120237 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Leergaard

Bibliographic record

VenueMagasin fra Det Kongelige Bibliotek · 2004
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indhold: Bøger og bibliotek; Sponsoraftale; Montanasalen; Montana Møbler A/S,; Korttyveri opklaret; Netadadgang med egen bærbare pc på Amager; BogForum 2004: Bevar bogen; H.C. Andersen-brevbiografi på nettet; Peder Laales Ordsprog online; Lucretius i ny udgave; Niels Schiørrings verdslige samlinger nu Online; Udstillinger; HOLCK - Politikens bladtegner gennem 40 år; UNSETTLED - 8 sydafrikanske fotografer; Oktogonen; Foredrag; Musikarrangementer; Berliner-Symfonier – CPHrDOX; Nordic Music Days; Debutkoncert: Nishiki Sano¸ Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Erhvervelser;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5320.412

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagasin fra Det Kongelige BibliotekSame topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207