Relations intersyndicales : CSN-FTQ-CEQ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis longtemps des essais de rapprochement ont eu lieu entre les diverses centrales syndicales.Relations industrielles y a déjà fait état 1. Après une phase morte suivie d'agression croissante, la Fédération des Travailleurs du Québec (FTQ), la Confédération des Syndicats Nationaux (CSN) et la Corporation des Enseignants du Québec (CEQ) ont cherché une solution commune. Nous reproduisons ici une chronologie de quelques faits importants à l’aide de deux textes publiés récemment l’un par la CSN2 et l'autre par la FTQ3. Nous y ajoutons copie du jet préliminaire FTQ-CSN-CEQ en date du 8 mars 1968. ( 1 ) GÉRARD DION, « La CTCC et l'unité ouvrière canadienne » dans Relations industrielles, vol. 12, no 1, 1957, pp. 32-53. GÉRARD DION, « La CTCC et l'affiliation au CTC » dans Relations Industrielles, vol. 13, no 1, 1958, pp. 57-61. (2) CSN, Le travail du permanent, vol. 4, no 11, 29 mars 1968, pp. 44-45. (3) FTQ, Résolution d'urgence en appel d'une interprétation de la constitution par le conseil exécutif du CTC, présenté au congrès du CTC, 5-10 mai 1968, pp. 4-6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".