Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical education in Australia is dynamic and going through a period of unprecedented change, according to the Australian Medical Council (AMC).Announcing the outcome of its medical school accreditation reviews and other decisions made at its Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2005, AMC President Dr. Joanna Flynn said the volume of change under way in medical education was reflected in the AMC’s medical school accreditation program.In 2004, the AMC accredited three new medical schools. In 2005, the AMC reviewed the progress of these schools, agreed to assess the plans for another new medical school, and the plans by one established school to offer its medical course in Malaysia in 2007.In 2004–2005, the AMC also reviewed Australia’s first three graduate-entry medical programs, which were introduced in 1995–96, and continue to produce quality graduates.“The changes are being driven by increased collaboration and better cross-fertilization of ideas between schools – ensuring all schools are improving to meet the quality of the best,” Dr. Flynn said.She also stated that, since its inception, the AMC had deliberately not stipulated what direction medical education in Australia should take. Instead, it had consciously fostered an environment of collaboration between universities and active peer review, to maximize best practice across medical schools.‘The level of innovation we see now and the diversity of approach to medical education in Australia demonstrates the value of this approach,” Dr Flynn said.Before the Council meeting, the Minister for Health and Ageing, The Honorable Tony Abbott MP, advised the AMC that a case had been made for the recognition of the new specialties of pain medicine and palliative medicine. As a result, the AMC considered the education and training programs available for doctors who wish to train in the new specialties. The AMC has advised the Minister on the accreditation of training programs in both specialties.The AMC also confirmed it had submitted its report to the Minister on an application by the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) for recognition of rural and remote medicine as a distinct specialty. The report will be published on the AMC’s website after the Minister has considered the report and released his decision about ACRRM’s application.AMC accreditation is mandatory for all university medical schools, which must meet explicit accreditation standards. The accreditation process involves detailed analysis of the proposed curriculum and medical school resources, rigorous review of clinical training opportunities and visits from clinical and community based assessment teams.General trends identified in 2004 were carried through to the 2005 accreditation process – including a greater focus on student directed learning, increased breadth of clinical experience beginning from first year and more emphasis on communication skills training.All medical schools reviewed during 2005 received positive assessments from an AMC Assessment Team. Detailed Accreditation Reports are available on the AMC website (www.amc.org.au). A range of strengths is detailed in each report and in all cases opportunities for improvement were identified in order to promote continuous improvement.In summary: The University of Notre Dame Australia (UNDA) is a new medical school. The AMC reviewed the first year of the program (implemented in 2005) and the University’s plans for Years 2 and 3 of the course. The AMC commended UNDA on its progress and collaboration with the University of Western Australia concerning clinical placements for students.The University of Tasmania is beginning a new five-year program, reflecting a complete turnaround in curriculum and approach. The AMC congratulated the medical school’s leadership, the staff commitment and the support of a wide range of other stakeholders, including the State and Commonwealth health departments, for the successful redevelopment of the course.The Australian National University Medical School is now implementing Year 2 of its four-year program, which developed from a clinical school of the University of Sydney. The AMC found the ANU program to have strong community support, backed by support from ACT Health for staffing and capital development. Particularly commended are the population health resources available to the school.The University of Auckland Medical School is a well established and well regarded school. It has implemented a major curriculum renewal strategy in the last three years. The AMC has commended the commitment of the University, the staff and clinical teachers to a high quality medical course relevant to the health care needs of the communities of New Zealand, the Pacific and beyond.The University of Queensland and The University of Sydney are both older established schools which are now graduating students from their graduate entry four-year programs. The implementation of the programs in these schools, together with Flinders University, marks the beginning of the current period of diversification, and collaboration between medical schools.Reprinted from the Australian Medical Council website.College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) Council President Dr. Gordon Arnett recently took center stage in Calgary as one of several guest speakers at the 9th Annual Glen Edwards Day Lectures.Put on by the University of Calgary’s Faculty of Medicine, the lectures focused on Issues in Patient Safety and attracted more than 200 people, including orthopedic surgeons, residents and allied health professionals interested in musculoskeletal injuries.Dr. Arnett’s 20-minute presentation began with a review of the College’s mission statement and how it plays a key role in ensuring and enhancing patient safety. “Our mission is to serve the public and guide the profession,” he noted. “Ensuring our members are clinically competent and meet professional standards is an absolute necessity in ensuring patient safety.”The concept of professionalism was the central focus of the presentation and is also a key component of Dr. Arnett’s speeches for the 2005 CPSA Regional Tour. In both instances, he outlines scenarios that help physicians understand the link between professionalism and patient safety. These include: The need for disclosure. When harm occurs – the CMA’s medical code of ethics clearly outlines the physician’s responsibility for full disclosure to the patient and the family. This approach is fully supported by the CPSA.The need for physicians to be clear in their communications with patients, colleagues and co-workers.Unnecessary delays in treatment, prescription mistakes, lack of follow up – all of these can be caused by poor communication and go against the basic tenet of professionalism – to put the patient’s needs before one’s own.Dr. Arnett’s speech also touched on the College’s complaints process, and how the approach to complaint resolution is similar to the approach being touted for the patient safety movement. Our ultimate goal for the complaints process is not to punish or blame, but to improve the quality of medicine available in Alberta. “By focusing on education and quality improvement, we allow physicians to learn from their mistakes,” notes Dr. Arnett in his presentation. “In fact, many voluntarily make changes to their practice, or agree to take additional training to address concerns that were raised during the complaints process.”For more than 25 years, the College has accredited medical laboratories and diagnostic imaging facilities throughout Alberta. With the more recent inclusion of neurophysiology, pulmonary and nonhospital surgical facilities, more than 700 diagnostic and treatment facilities are accredited by the College every four years.Accreditation activities are currently managed with a variety of paper-based systems. To create a more efficient process to collect and collate data, and to monitor and guide the quality of care in these facilities, the College is moving to an electronic platform that will store information from the accreditation process and enable more meaningful and timely data analysis. This platform will also streamline the accreditation process for facilities, inspectors and the College.The College is collaborating with HealthMetrx Canada of Vancouver in the development of this digital accreditation platform (DigitalAP). It is a multi-phase project encompassing the full scope of accreditation activities, including the preassessment phase, on-site reporting, the post-assessment phase, and comprehensive standards management. With the success of DigitalAP in province-wide pilots and laboratory assessments in the Peace Country Region and Calgary Health Regions, the College has made a five-year commitment to manage the accreditation process using DigitalAP.During the next two years, pilot projects will be introduced for diagnostic imaging, pulmonary, cardiac stress testing, neurophysiology and non-hospital surgical facilities requiring accreditation. For more information on the digital accreditation platform or the pilot projects, please contact Ms. Barb Unger, Manager of the Quality of Care Department at (780) 970-6249, (800) 320-8624, ext. 249 or by e-mail at bunger@cpsa.ab.ca.A woman attended a dermatologist regarding excessive facial hair growth. According to the patient, she was reassured by the physician she could expect permanent hair reduction from the treatments.After several treatments, she expressed dissatisfaction with the results. The physician provided additional treatments free of charge. Despite the extensive treatment received, both at her cost (approximately $1,800) and at the physician’s expense (approximately $900), the patient was dissatisfied with the results. When she confronted the physician, she was told that there was adequate improvement. Some time after these clinical encounters, she received a newsletter from the physician’s office stating: I was the first doctor in (city) involved in laser hair removal. I am the only one with two sophisticated units – Lumenis’ Lightsheer and Palomar’s Estelux IPL system. These are recognized as being the best in the industry. That’s why I offer a guarantee – permanent hair reduction or your money refunded. I am the only one in (city) bold enough to make this claim.In the same newsletter, the physician also made statements implying that his/her clinic met or exceeded international standards of excellence in Photo Rejuvenation, Botox and Liposuction. The physician happily reported to patients that “in many areas of my practice, we are leading the way.”The complainant suggested that physicians hold a position of trust in society and should not be allowed to make claims and not honor them.The physician responded that the patient had olive skin with some dark and coarse hairs, as well as some light and fine hairs. It was felt that some reduction in her hair growth could be achieved. The physician indicated that at no time was she misled as to what to expect but rather she was educated about what was possible and not possible in her case. The physician provided the College with a copy of the guarantee offered to the patient stating: If there has been NO visible improvement after completing the recommended eight-treatment program, you will receive a full refund or a free package to treat that area again.The College in its investigation recognized that complete hair loss may not be a reasonable expectation, particularly in patients with darker complexion and light fine hairs. It was noted that the patient signed a consent that clearly lists the potential for a 20 percent incidence of no permanent hair loss. Furthermore, the physician offered the patient free packages of treatment when the results were suboptimal from her perspective. As a result, the College was unable to support the patient’s claim that the physician acted unprofessionally and without compassion in the provision of her care.Our review of the physician’s newsletter found it to be aggrandizing and self promoting. From the College’s perspective, advertising to the public should be factual, easily understandable and dignified. A practitioner should not make false or misleading promises or compare him/herself to others directly, indirectly or by innuendo to any other practitioner, clinic or facility.Discussions were held with the physician about the ethics of advertising. The physician agreed that the statements in the newsletter were unprofessional and committed to put in place a rigorous review process for future newsletters and promotional materials in order to ensure compliance with the College bylaws. In addition, the physician will issue an apology in his/her newsletter in which he/she undertakes in future advertising to meet the high ethical standard the public expects of the medical profession.Reprinted from issues 119, 120 and 121 of The Messenger, published by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta.The General Medical Council regulates more than 3,000 doctors in Northern Ireland and is to open its first ever Northern Ireland office before the end of the year.The GMC has appointed Alan Walker as Head of Northern Ireland Affairs to provide a local focus to its operations from December 2005. This fulfills the promise made by GMC 12 months ago to review its arrangements in Northern Ireland.“We are delighted that Alan has accepted the post of Head of Northern Ireland Affairs,” said Professor Sir Graeme Catto, President of the GMC. “Given his background in representing the interests of Northern Ireland, we are certain that the skills he will bring to the role will support the GMC’s commitment to ensuring the differing health issues in the devolved nations are effectively addressed. We are committed to actively participating in the development of Northern Ireland health policy and look forward to having a permanent presence locally.”The decision to open a new office followed consultation with key stakeholders, who overwhelmingly supported the of a GMC presence in Northern This will be the GMC in and The Northern Ireland office will and with the Northern Ireland and other key and decision in the health including and their look forward to up this new role with the GMC and with all the health said Alan the new Head of Northern Ireland Affairs at the representing the health I will to ensure the of Northern Ireland is and This will better enable the GMC to monitor health care issues across the and to the health in Northern It will also that we can our on patient and public in Northern Ireland, ensuring that medical is a between the public and the medical GMC has a to the who may be to students from medical schools based in the The the GMC position on the from certain based medical schools, an investigation the claim to have with information for and other medical clinical placements for medical on the GMC website are for not The information will change from time to time and you will be to the current on our This was recently in November are medical schools that are recognized by the GMC. The medical education at these medical schools with the curriculum by the GMC. the medical education at these medical schools is quality by the General Medical We have of the curriculum and we and monitor standards in basic medical This both education more the first year of program A medical from one of these medical schools, to our other is recognized for the of with the medical students clinical placements as of their medical placements in the ensure that student education the of health care and with experience in a variety of including and community medical arrangements for clinical placements are at local level between the medical schools and the or other clinical clinical placements should ensure that the students are at one of the based medical schools are that there are some and medical medical These not the GMC’s and are not or quality in any way by the GMC. clinical placements for the students from should about the medical education provision and the quality The GMC is unable to provide a quality role and are recommended to and take before clinical placements for students.The General Medical Council has the approach to information that was agreed to at an international in November than from health care health and professional from the of attended the in with the of of together and of to practice of the was to look at of ensuring patient safety health care professionals to their to of across The GMC has been at a the of and is a and approach. other to the GMC in there is the to receive better information than has in the from its to the project to take forward the on information at the The of the project the GMC will will and the implementation in all of the The project will have from a will to information regarding or which are to have for to in professional of doctors are competent and professionals who a said GMC President Sir Graeme public that we have in place to the who may a to patients and from up We have to the for information between We increased for the medical but we also have to ensure no between of for doctors and their from the General Medical Council for the of Medical on Medical for in New Zealand, are The will be held at the with of other place on to the The Medical Council of New is the and has established a of four members who are the and the development of the program, Issues – The has been in consultation with to speakers and and to other to a successful The first for will take place this For additional information about the including the program, or to of in information when it the link can be of can be from the and the Medical Council of New as of the some of you will need to for your at the The can be Medical Council of New – project with the Health is A was developed by the two for and information about medical the results of which will be to in that could be the development of an adequate health The was to medical and in The have been and a report is being developed for inclusion in the Health which is to be published on of this project and other regarding has been submitted to in order that with as a can be should be by regarding the development of a successful can physician information and the of competent physicians from one to projects are in progress that will be and to create the for this Medical Council of New and the General Medical Council in the are an of the electronic of to each other physicians by on and at the time the is the involved in the of has to Ireland, New and in Canada and Australia have indicated their in being of the were in the to in the and assessment of project has been and stage one has been agreed information to be with the consent to help the of doctors who have New or the who are not New or of New and – in New this will with medical schools to – continue to to information on and of time a doctor has and his/her on of entry and the at certain of each is a that a of could be made from the in have agreed that a for and information is at this time to the many that have to be Instead, it will be more to and and to continue ideas as the implementation of and of information at the of that information can be to it is A at the is being to this issue and has been the standards of differing by including Ireland, New Zealand, the and the and The is to it be possible for the to or each for doctors these The has the stated of the and the The has also the level and scope of the entry scope of the in of areas of in assessment standards both basic and clinical and the has been to standards and of the can be to future by The will a of how the their in an international focusing on best and forward the information to the for their in are of medical has been and to all in the international The of the is to communication between that of is across In order to ensure the is a have been to report any see in the way the are in their which will be in the as a of the will be to for their and on and and a that was for from members on to by being a of The will be considered by the as an for the next two to three years, and will be to for at the General in has its of the including submitted by for to the and for improving A report will be to members next for will be considered by the for the and for of the A report will be developed and submitted to the for and to members for at the General website is being that it can be by members as an active in their to and of medical and learn about new in medical A has been that members can with each other in from all and and General are being in the and the international is being to to be to members The members to place the website link their to by and the The is Medical Council of New has identified the need to review the to a scope of practice for international medical In of changes to the current the Council has a consultation possible The Council is stakeholders, including the Council is on this and your to the in the In the Council is interested in your on of a as a in a scope of practice and their for a scope of Council any you or your be to offer on the consultation The can be in your to at the Council office or by e-mail to by you for information from your to be considered for in the If e-mail and to at or to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.445 | 0.246 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".