Deposition Study of Indium Trisguanidinate as a Possible Indium Nitride Precursor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>A time-resolved chemical vapor deposition process for indium nitride (InN) is reported using tris-<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethyl-<i>N</i>’,<i>N</i>”-diisopropylguanidinatoindium(III) (<b>1</b>) and ammonia plasma at 200 °C. The deposition was self-limiting with respect to the pulse time of <b>1</b>, indicative of a surface-controlled deposition chemistry. The films were confirmed to be InN by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and film thicknesses of 10 nm were measured by X-ray reflectivity (XRR), corresponding to a deposition rate of 0.1 nm/cycle. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) showed a hexagonal polycrystalline film with a preferred (002) orientation. Morphology studies suggest an island growth mode. The poor thermal stability of <b>1</b>, previously discussed in the literature, prevented full characterization of the deposition process and the deposition of thicker films. It is concluded that while <b>1</b> can act as an In precursor for InN, its poor thermal stability prevents its practical use. </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".