MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4253232827 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-40329/v1

Planning of Births and Childhood Undernutrition in Nepal: Evidence from a 2016 National Survey

2020· preprint· en· W4253232827 on OpenAlexaff
Ishwar Tiwari, Kiran Acharya, Yuba Raj Paudel, Bhim Prasad Sapkota, Ramesh Babu Kafle

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalnutritionEnvironmental healthGeographyMedicinePediatricsEconomic growthSocioeconomicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Childhood undernutrition is a significant public health issue in low-and middle-income countries, including Nepal. However, there is limited evidence showing the association between the planning of birth (PoB) and childhood undernutrition (stunting and underweight). We aim to investigate the relationship between PoB and childhood undernutrition in the current study. Methods We used the Nepal Demographic Health Survey 2016 data, which is a nationally representative cross-sectional household survey. We used two common anthropometric indicators of childhood undernutrition as the outcome of this study. PoB is the main predictor of interest. Binary logistic regression with sampling weights was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals to examine the association between the PoB and childhood undernutrition. Results The overall prevalence of stunting was 35.8%, and underweight was 27.1% in under-five children in Nepal. We found a higher rate of stunting (52.7%) and underweight (41.1%) in children with birth order > 3 and < 2 years of interval between birth and subsequent birth (IBBSB). The association between the birth order of children and the prevalence of undernutrition had strong statistical significance (p < 0.001). Mother’s age at marriage (p = 0.001), underweight mother (p < 0.001), mother’s education (p < 0.001), father’s education (p < 0.001), wealth quintile (p < 0.001), no exposure to mass media (p < 0.001), children’s age (p < 0.001), area of residence(p = 0.001) were significantly associated with childhood undernutrition. The result of the multiple logistic regression showed that children with birth order one and 12–24 months of interval between marriage and first birth (IBMFB) had significantly decreased odds of stunting as compared to those children with birth order one and < 12 months of IBMFB (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9). Conclusion The findings of the study demonstrate that PoB has a protective effect on childhood undernutrition. Delaying of childbirth until 12–24 months after marriage was found to be associated with reduced odds of childhood stunting. To mitigate childhood undernutrition, Nepal’s government needs to promote delayed childbearing after marriage while focusing on uplifting the household economics status and wide coverage of and utilization of mass media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→