MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4253232975 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11304

Effects of a Northern Contaminant Mixture, Diet, and Body Weight on Glucose and Cholesterol Metabolism and Lipoprotein Signaling in JCR Rat Liver

2016· dissertation· en· W4253232975 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdulrahman Almohaisen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipogenesisCarbohydrate-responsive element-binding proteinGluconeogenesisTranscription factorBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineLipid metabolismSterol regulatory element-binding proteinCholesterolCarbohydrate metabolismFructoseSugarDiabetes mellitusBiochemistryMetabolismSterolGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern Canadian populations (specifically the Inuit) display higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. It is believed that diet and lifestyle contribute to the development of these disease; however, recent epidemiological studies suggest that persistent organic pollutants and heavy metals may also contribute to the development of these diseases. In this study, we outline the effects of these chemicals and the consumption of high fat/sugar food on glucose and cholesterol metabolism and lipoprotein signaling in JCR rat liver. Using gene profiler arrays, we have identified four genes that are affected mainly by these contaminants and/or diet. Our results indicate that these mixtures alter the expression of genes in gluconeogenesis pathway (fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase and pyruvate carboxylase), a protein involved in cholesterol transport (apolipoprotein A1), and a transcription factor that is responsible for the expression of proteins in lipogenesis pathway (sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→