MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253233712 · doi:10.1177/0361198105193600126

Performance of an Induced Trench Installation

2005· article· en· W4253233712 on OpenAlexafffund
Rodney McAffee, Arun J. Valsangkar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsLeveeTrenchCulvertGeotechnical engineeringLateral earth pressureGeologyOverburdenSettlement (finance)Overburden pressureStructural engineeringEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An induced trench installation was instrumented to measure earth pressures both within the embankment and on the pipe. Deformations of the pipe and settlements within the embankment also were monitored. At the full height of the embankment, the average vertical and horizontal stress on the culvert remained relatively constant at 0.32 and 0.48 times the overburden stress, respectively. The pressures measured directly on the pipe compare favorably with other case histories presented within the literature and are in good agreement with the observed vertical elongation of the culvert. Pressure cells positioned within the embankment measured stresses roughly equal to the overburden stresses and indicate no significant redistribution of stresses other than those observed immediately around the pipe. The relative settlements within the embankment, above the induced trench installation, correspond with the design assumption that the fill within the prism of soil over the pipe settles downward relative to the adjacent fill. However, the recommended settlement ratio parameter used in the analysis, on the basis of geometry alone, may be questionable. That higher-than-expected lateral stresses on the pipe need to be considered in design was confirmed. Marston's formula and lower-bound input parameters appear to give a conservative estimate of the vertical loads on buried pipes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207