MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253256567 · doi:10.1017/9781108526227.020

Elementary Primer on Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)

2018· other· en· W4253256567 on OpenAlexaff
William Hoiles, Vikram Krishnamurthy, Bruce Cornell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartial differential equationApplied mathematicsMathematicsUniquenessScope (computer science)Calculus (dental)Computer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapters 10–12 described continuum models of engineered membranes that involved partial differential equations (PDEs). This appendix gives a brief introduction to the classification of PDEs, linear PDEs, nondimensionalization of PDEs, and numerical methods for solving PDEs. Uniqueness and existence results are not discussed here since they involve advanced results in functional analysis that are outside the scope of this book. For a comprehensive advanced treatment of PDEs at a graduate mathematics level see [115]. Linear, Semilinear, and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations PDEs are typically classified into linear, semilinear, and nonlinear. Linear PDEs are important as several methods exist to obtain closed-form solutions of these PDEs (under simple boundary conditions), including separation of variables, superposition, Fourier series, Laplace transform, and Fourier transform. The solution to some semilinear PDEs can be obtained using the symmetry method or method of characteristics. When a linear or semilinear PDE has more sophisticated boundary conditions (as is the case with engineered membranes), the PDE needs to be solved numerically. Similarly, nonlinear PDEs typically do not have an exact solution and must also be solved numerically. Consider a generic PDE of two scalar variables (space x and time t ), where u ( x, t ) is a function of the variables x and t . A linear PDE has the form where a ( x, t ) , b ( x, t ) , c ( x, t ), and d ( x, t ) are generic functions of x and t but not u . A PDE is semilinear if the coefficient function a ( x, t ) of the highest partial derivative is dependent on x and t but not u . Therefore, (A.1) is a semilinear PDE if the coefficient functions can be expressed as a ( x, t ) , b ( x, t, u ) , c ( x, t, u ), and d ( x, t, u ). If the PDE is neither linear nor semilinear, it is nonlinear. Linear, semilinear, and nonlinear PDEs are all used to model the dynamics of engineered membranes. For example: Linear. Poisson's equation ((10.3) on page 180), the Nernst–Planck equation ((10.9) on page 182), the Poisson–Fermi equation ((11.23) on page 233), and the Fokker– Planck equation ((14.28) on page 318).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207