MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253270282 · doi:10.2307/j.ctv15wxr5j.107

How Far Have We Come Since Our “Go Live” Dates, and Where Do We Go from Here?

2016· book-chapter· en· W4253270282 on OpenAlexaff
Ann Kutulas, Moon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGo/no goHistoryGotoGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next-generation library systems promise new opportunities to expand beyond our existing methodologies, and there has been a surge of institutions migrating to web-based platforms as a result.Extensive research and planning goes into choosing and moving to a new integrated library system (ILS).But what happens after migration and implementation?And how closely does reality align with expectations?Individuals from three libraries who have chosen Ex Libris's Alma as their web-based ILS solution will share their migration experiences and the challenges of working in a constantly changing environment.Strategies on transitioning from an abstract understanding to a live production site will be addressed, as well as the possibilities to collaborate in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdue University Press eBooksSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207