MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253282146 · doi:10.4000/alsic.755

Éditorial

2005· article· fr· W4253282146 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Antoniadis, Thierry Chanier

Bibliographic record

VenueAlsic · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Learned Journals
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons le plaisir de publier dans la revue Alsic ce numéro thématique consacré au traitement automatique des langues (Tal) et à l'apprentissage des langues. Les six articles regroupés à cette occasion sont des versions étendues et relues par notre comité scientifique d'articles originellement présentés lors de la journée d'étude de l'Atala (Association pour le Traitement Automatique des Langues) le 22 octobre 2004 à Grenoble. Même si notre revue a déjà ouvert ses colonnes à des articles a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.077

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlsicSame topicSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench-language works237,207