MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4253291462 · doi:10.14740/jmc2060w

Protracted Course of Relapsing-Remitting Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an Adolescent

2015· article· en· W4253291462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ankit Rao, Syed Nadir Abbas, Yuk Ting, Pankaj Punia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaSorafenibInternal medicineContext (archaeology)CirrhosisRadiation therapyOncologyChemotherapyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global healthcare problem commonest in males with hepatic cirrhosis or hepatitis B virus infection. Fibrolamellar HCC is a subtype seen mainly in younger patients without conventional risk factors and perhaps has a somewhat more favorable prognosis than typical HCC. Here we report a case of fibrolamellar HCC presenting in an adolescent with a prolonged, relapsing-remitting course characterized by prolonged exposure to sorafenib including in the adjuvant context, use of adjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy, resection of multiple metachronous pulmonary metastases and dramatic response to radiotherapy delivered as tomotherapy to her metastatic hilar lymphadenopathy. We speculate on the possible synergistic interactions between radiotherapy and her anti-angiogenic therapy and on what systemic treatment options might be open to her in the future including further targeted therapy and also immunotherapy including immune checkpoint blockade such as anti-CTLA4 and PD-1. J Med Cases. 2015;6(3):113-118 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2060w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis→French-language works237,207→