MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253321455 · doi:10.3917/lpm.002.0020

Christian Lacroix

2000· article· fr· W4253321455 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Saillard

Bibliographic record

VenueLa pensée de midi · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtBaroqueArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Dans les années quatre-vingt, à un moment où la haute couture s’endort sur ses paillettes, ses plumes et ses dorures, Christian Lacroix apparaît sur la scène de la mode parisienne, partagée entre le minimalisme, voire le misérabilisme, des réformateurs et créateurs japonais, et une industrie du luxe au parfum fané. En quelques succès désinvoltes chez Patou, où il assume la direction artistique du style et de la création, il réussit à réactiver le mécanisme trop bien huilé de la haute couture en développant un vêtement à la luxuriance baroque qui suscite l’intérêt des rédactrices de mode trop acquises aux griffes de maisons conventionnelles. Aujourd’hui ses collections haute couture rivalisent d’audace et de modernité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa pensée de midiSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207