MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253330120 · doi:10.33772/jpmit.v2i2.14926

Sosialisasi Sistem Informasi Orang Dalam Pengawasan (ODP) di Kota Kendari

2020· article· id· W4253330120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Terapan (JPMIT) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Merebaknya Kasus Covid-19 khususnya untuk daerah Kota Kendari membuat masyarakat menjadi resah dan takut. Informasi data-data Orang Dalam Pemantauan (ODP) disetiap kelurahan masih kurang, sehingga masyarakat belum mengetaui berapa orang yang menjadi ODP di setiap kelurahan atau RT/RW dari masing-masing kelurahan. Dalam memecahkan masalah tersebut diperlukan sebuah sistem informasi yang dapat memberikan informasi kepada Lurah atau masyarakat mengenai informasi data-data ODP di setiap Kelurahan, sehingga masyarakat dapat mengetahuinya dan dapat di akses melalui internet/mobile. Dalam pengembangan sistem informasi orang dalam pemantaun dengan menggunakan metode waterfall. Metode ini menggambarkan pendekatan yang cukup sistematis juga berurutan pada pengembangan software. Hasil dari sistem informasi orang dalam pemantauan pihak satuan gugus covid dalam memberikan informasi ke masyarakat mengenai orang dalam pemantauan di setiap kelurahan Kota Kendari.Kata Kunci: sistem, informasi, ODP, Covid-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it