MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253333284 · doi:10.1515/9783839404904-008

PRAGMA TIC IDEALISM IN CHALLENGING STRUCTURAL POWER

2006· book-chapter· en· W4253333284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdealismPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflections on the situational ethics of Advocacy AnthropologyOn a cold February day in 1999, my small airplane flew from Nova Scotia across the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Newfoundland and landed at Gander on the island's north shore.A Mi'kmaq Indian friend picked me up in his truck.I had visited N ewfoundland before, but never in the winter.As a special guest of the Mi'kmaq Indian community ofMiawpukek at Conne River, a small fishing village at Bay d'Espoir on the island's south coast, my earlier fieldwork trip in the summer of 1996 had been a pleasure.This time, however, it was serious business as two Newfoundland Mi'kmaq Indian fisherrneo were on trial for having violated Section 78(a) of this Canadian province's Fisheries Act.Although this was not the frrst time Mi'kmaq had been arrested or fined for violating federal or provincial hunting and fishing laws, Miawpukek's headman and tribal council had determined to challenge the authority of the provincial government on this particular front.They argued that they still possessed traditional rights to bunt, fish, and trap in ancestral territories on the island.Legal advisers maintained that the Mi'kmaq's aboriginal rights are officially protected by Canada's 1982 Constitution Act, which explicitly states: "The existing Aboriginal and Treaty Rights of aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recoguized and affrrmed."My own long-term historical research on Mi'kmaq cultural history led me to support the Miawpukek First Nation in its legal confrontation.I had worked on various native rights claims with bands within the Mi'kmaq tribal nation since 1981 and authored a historical ethnography titled The Mi 'kmaq: Resistance, Accommodation, and Cultural Survival (1996).I had also presented dozens of scholarly papers at professional meetings and published scores of articles conceruing Mi'kmaq culture and history.My support for the Miawpukek positionwas evident in a paper I presented at a 1996 conference of specialists at the University ofToronto in 1996, subsequently published as 'We Fight with Dignity ': The Miawpukek Mi 'kmaq Quest for Aboriginal Rights in Newfoundland (Prins 1998).Combined with my professional status as a university professor, these scholarly credits made me a potentially valuable expert witness in court room trials such as the case formally known as R. v. lohn and lohn, described here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it