PRAGMA TIC IDEALISM IN CHALLENGING STRUCTURAL POWER
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reflections on the situational ethics of Advocacy AnthropologyOn a cold February day in 1999, my small airplane flew from Nova Scotia across the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Newfoundland and landed at Gander on the island's north shore.A Mi'kmaq Indian friend picked me up in his truck.I had visited N ewfoundland before, but never in the winter.As a special guest of the Mi'kmaq Indian community ofMiawpukek at Conne River, a small fishing village at Bay d'Espoir on the island's south coast, my earlier fieldwork trip in the summer of 1996 had been a pleasure.This time, however, it was serious business as two Newfoundland Mi'kmaq Indian fisherrneo were on trial for having violated Section 78(a) of this Canadian province's Fisheries Act.Although this was not the frrst time Mi'kmaq had been arrested or fined for violating federal or provincial hunting and fishing laws, Miawpukek's headman and tribal council had determined to challenge the authority of the provincial government on this particular front.They argued that they still possessed traditional rights to bunt, fish, and trap in ancestral territories on the island.Legal advisers maintained that the Mi'kmaq's aboriginal rights are officially protected by Canada's 1982 Constitution Act, which explicitly states: "The existing Aboriginal and Treaty Rights of aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recoguized and affrrmed."My own long-term historical research on Mi'kmaq cultural history led me to support the Miawpukek First Nation in its legal confrontation.I had worked on various native rights claims with bands within the Mi'kmaq tribal nation since 1981 and authored a historical ethnography titled The Mi 'kmaq: Resistance, Accommodation, and Cultural Survival (1996).I had also presented dozens of scholarly papers at professional meetings and published scores of articles conceruing Mi'kmaq culture and history.My support for the Miawpukek positionwas evident in a paper I presented at a 1996 conference of specialists at the University ofToronto in 1996, subsequently published as 'We Fight with Dignity ': The Miawpukek Mi 'kmaq Quest for Aboriginal Rights in Newfoundland (Prins 1998).Combined with my professional status as a university professor, these scholarly credits made me a potentially valuable expert witness in court room trials such as the case formally known as R. v. lohn and lohn, described here.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle