MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253346999 · doi:10.2196/preprints.26798

Development and Application of Mini App "Travel Health Guide" (Preprint)

2020· preprint· en· W4253346999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weisi Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUploadChinaPreprintPublic healthDisease controlBusinessCommissionTourismEnvironmental healthPublic relationsWorld Wide WebMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND It can be seen that the occurrence of disease in the destination is closely related to the health of travelers. The public urgently needs a localized disease status retrieval tool. Mini App is an application that can be used without downloading and installing. Users can scan or search from WeChat to open the application. It’s the most popular way for Chinese people to use it. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the feasibility of establishing disease risk communication platform system in the era of artificial intelligence and big data, to provide suggestions for disease control workers and the public to establish an information-based data platform for efficient communication, and to provide practical and scientific basis for the implementation of accurate communication strategy of risk communication. METHODS The data of authoritative portal websites and authoritative websites in related fields were collected and integrated into a practical destination disease information platform suitable for the public. The data source includes World Health Organization, National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China, China Center for Disease Control and prevention, CDC of the United States, ECDC of Europe, portal of Hong Kong Health Protection Center, etc. RESULTS A total of 946 pieces of information were collected from the National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China (300), CDC (370), World Health Organization (170), Covid-19 guidelines (79) and Canada tourism network-- travel.gc.ca (27). The number of searches was 1134. CONCLUSIONS This small program conforms to the current new media data age, people's habits, directly facing the public, let the public understand the disease situation of the tourism destination, and obtain authoritative prevention and control guidelines; it provides information and convenience for the public, and has a good practical application prospect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Software
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1670.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods · Software

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207