MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253378716 · doi:10.5250/legacy.34.2.0399

[no title]

2017· article· W4253378716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hsuan L. Hsu

Bibliographic record

VenueLegacy A Journal of American Women Writers · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirScholarshipJournalismHistoryArt historySociologyMedia studiesLiteratureArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Becoming Sui Sin Far: Early Fiction, Journalism, and Travel Writing by Edith Maude Eaton ed. by Mary Chapman Hsuan L. Hsu Becoming Sui Sin Far: Early Fiction, Journalism, and Travel Writing by Edith Maude Eaton. Ed. Mary Chapman. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2016. lxxvi + 274 pp. $110 cloth/ $34.95 paper. Until recently, readers of Edith Maude Eaton, also known as Sui Sin Far, have focused on the Chinatown-oriented fiction collected in Mrs. Spring Fragrance (1912), along with a handful of nonfiction essays and sketches. On the basis of these works, critics have established Eaton as an important antecedent for Asian diasporic mixed-race literatures as well as a sophisticated practitioner of literary regionalism, sentimental fiction, journalism, and memoir. Building on both earlier scholarship and her own extensive archival research, Mary Chapman’s Becoming Sui Sin Far presents a broader picture of Eaton’s career—a corpus of more than 260 texts (carefully documented in a comprehensive, chronological bibliography of Eaton’s known works) that goes far beyond American Chinatowns and encompasses multiple and heterogeneous communities in (and in between) Canada, Jamaica, China, and the United States. Presenting dozens of newly discovered works that Eaton authored under a range of identities (from “Edith Eaton” and “E. E.” to “Fire Fly,” “Sui Seen Far,” and the male merchant “Wing Sing”), Chapman’s collection will shift how scholars understand Eaton’s experiments with the transgression of national, racial, formal, sexual, and gender boundaries. In the volume’s introduction, Chapman provides an invaluable overview of Eaton’s biography, the “expanded oeuvre” of her previously uncollected writings, and major trends in the critical reception of her work (xxii). The introduction complements scholarly assessments of Eaton’s cosmopolitanism and her cross-racial analogies with Chapman’s striking discoveries about Eaton’s family history: for example, her mother, Achuen Amoy, had previously traveled [End Page 399] to England and the United States as a child performer in a touring troupe of Chinese acrobats, and her father was a “‘kingpin’” among the Montreal-based smugglers who transported Chinese across the border into the United States (xxvi). Eaton’s own experiences as a mixed-race, diasporic journalist moving among Canada, Jamaica, and the United States while frequently writing about China inform Chapman’s assessment of her early work, which shows “incredible diversity in terms of genre, venue of publication, subject matter, style, and assumed audience” (xxi). Among other things, the previously uncollected writings demonstrate Eaton’s exceptional versatility as a professional writer producing work for “a far wider range of publications than has previously been acknowledged” (xxi); these works “[challenge] the presumed centrality of China and Chinatowns to Eaton’s work” (xxii), highlight “the significance of her career as an early woman journalist” (xxiii), and showcase “Eaton’s efforts to examine racial identities beyond the Chinese” (xxiii). These writings will provide new evidence for scholars interested in the themes of transnational circulation and cross-racial affiliations in both Eaton’s work and her personal development. For Chapman, smuggling in Eaton’s journalism, family history, and fiction becomes a trope for a sensibility oriented toward surreptitious border crossing—or toward subjects positioned between and across normative identities: The diverse historical and fictional characters whose stories Eaton tells yearn for flexible subject positions that can encompass their complex racial, ethnic, legal, gender, sexual, religious, and class identities, whether they are Chinese immigrants struggling to fit into North American society, North American–born Chinese juggling inherited cultural traditions and the traditions of the society in which they live, the mixed-race individuals with whom Eaton most identifies, or multicultural/multinational individuals whose genealogies and lived experiences complicate their senses of self. (xxviii) Becoming Sui Sin Far traces Eaton’s development across what Chapman calls the first phase of her career—“a period of authorial experimentation between 1888, when Eaton’s earliest known publications began to appear in Montreal newspapers and magazines, and about 1898, when, after having tried out Sue Seen Far, Sui Seen Far, and Sui Sin Fah, she committed to spelling her new pen name Sui Sin Far” (xxviii). The book’s first section reproduces some of Eaton’s earliest known works...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7130.630

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegacy A Journal of American Women WritersSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207