CSHP Professional Practice Conference 2012: Poster Abstracts / Conférence sur la pratique professionnelle 2012 de la SCPH : Résumés des affiches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facilitated Poster Session: Discussion of original research, award-winning projects, and pharmacy practice projects Séance animée de presentations par affiches : Discussions sur des projets de recherché originale, des projets primes et des projets dans le domaine de la pratique pharmaceutique Antimicrobial and Pediatrics1.An Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Program Experience at the University Health Network 2. Evaluation of a Prospective Audit and Feedback Program in Critical Care: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis (award-see page 76) 3. Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices for Catheter Urine Cultures 4. Oseltamivir Pharmacokinetics in Morbid Obesity (OPTIMO Trial) (award-see page 77) 5. Description of Propofol Use in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit 6. Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Emergency Department (ED) Asthma Action Plan and Prescription (AAPP) (award-see page 75) Clinical
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".