Response to Comment on “1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Reactions with OH<sup>-</sup>, Cr(II), Granular Iron, and a Copper−Iron Bimetal: Insights from Product Formation and Associated Carbon Isotope Fractionation”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCorrespondence/Rebut...Correspondence/RebuttalResponse to Comment on "1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Reactions with OH-, Cr(II), Granular Iron, and a Copper−Iron Bimetal: Insights from Product Formation and Associated Carbon Isotope Fractionation"Martin Elsner, David M. Cwiertny, A. Lynn Roberts, and Barbara Sherwood LollarView Author Information Institute of Groundwater Ecology GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering A242 Bourns Hall University of California, Riverside Riverside, California 92521 Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering Johns-Hopkins University 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, 21218 Stable Isotope Laboratory University of Toronto 22 Russell Street Toronto, ON M5S 3B1, CanadaCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 22, 7949–7950Publication Date (Web):October 19, 2007Publication History Published online19 October 2007Published inissue 1 November 2007https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es072046zhttps://doi.org/10.1021/es072046zarticle-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2007 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views409Altmetric-Citations8LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (46 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Fractionation,Iron,Reactivity,Redox reactions,Transfer reactions Get e-Alerts
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".