MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction

2006· article· en· W4253431605 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jerome F. Singleton

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Geriatric Rehabilitation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)PopulationUnit (ring theory)RehabilitationPopulation ageingMedicineGerontologyIsolation (microbiology)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

North America is aging. It is predicted that by 2020 approximately 20% of North Americans will be older than 65. This demographic shift in society will have an impact on the social and economic structure of North America. Individuals in this population will be confronted with a variety of issues that may impact on their health and well-being from acquiring a disability to economic limitations due to changing pension plans. This demographic shift is not occurring in isolation, as older individuals are part of a family support structure. When an individual becomes ill, a family member will often provide caregiving to the person. The question arises as to what information rehabilitation professional will need to assist caregivers of an older person. The purpose of this issue of Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation is to provide insights into how caregiving affects leisure opportunities for caregivers. One area of caregivers' lives that is sacrificed is their social and leisure pursuits. Because of the unrelenting demands placed upon caregivers, their level of participation in leisure pursuits often declines. Leisure has been highlighted as playing an important role in the development and maintenance of family ties and relationships. Therefore, with leisure not being present in the family unit, relationships between family members may become strained. A lack of leisure can further add to the stress the family members experience as a result of their relative's illness. The family, and especially the primary caregiver, may reach a point where an alternative means of care for the relative is sought. It may be decided by the family to place the relative in a nursing home. Since many individuals often view nursing homes negatively, placing a relative in a home can be difficult for families to accept. The authors in this issue provide insights into the role and function of persons who are caregivers and the effect on their leisure opportunities. Loucks-Atkinson, Kleiber, and Williamson's article, “Activity restriction and well-being in middle-aged and older caregivers,” illustrates the complexities of how caregiving impacts activity participation. Stadnyk's findings from her study, “Community-dwelling spouses of nursing home residents: Activities that sustain identities in times of transition,” describes how activities can assist caregivers. MacDonald's article, “Family and staff perceptions of the impact of the long-term care environment on leisure,” describes how the environment influences perceptions of abilities within the Bronfenbrenner Ecological model. Martin's article explores the complexities of “Family's leisure experiences and leisure adjustments made with a person with Alzheimer's.” This article describes how a person with Alzheimer's affects one family's leisure. Bedini and Gladwell's article, “Barriers to leisure travel of family caregivers: A preliminary examination,” describes how being a caregiver affects the cargiver's ability to travel. Charters and Murray's article, “Design and evaluation of a leisure education program for caregivers of institutionalized care recipients,” illustrates the role leisure education can play in enhancing the well-being of caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's in long-term care. Genoe and Singleton's article, “Older men's leisure experiences across their lifespan,” places older men's leisure within a hegemonic masculinity framework. The older men's leisure opportunities in this study were framed within the dominant societal context of when they entered lifecourse transitions. The information in this issue of Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation provides rehabilitation professionals with information framed within the context of the caregiver's experience. Rehabilitation is not just about the person with a disability but encompasses the family. This issue of Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation provides insights into how the caregiving role may affect leisure opportunities for not only the caregiver but also other family members. Jerome F. Singleton, PhD, CTRS Professor, Leisure Studies School of Health and Human Performance Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Geriatric RehabilitationSame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207