MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Advisory Board

2014· other· en· W4253567181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiamiLibrary sciencePublishingManagementPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2014), "Editorial Advisory Board", Shopper Marketing and the Role of In-Store Marketing (Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 11), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-643520140000011011 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Rick P. Bagozzi University of Michigan, USA Russell Belk York University, Canada Ruth Bolton Arizona State University, USA George Day University of Pennsylvania, USA Michael Houston University of Minnesota, USA Shelby Hunt Texas Tech University, USA Arun K. Jain State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Barbara Kahn University of Pennsylvania, USA Wagner Kamakura Rice University, USA Dawn Iacobucci Vanderbilt University, USA Donald Lehmann Columbia University, USA Robert F. Lusch University of Arizona, USA Debbie MacInnis University of Southern California, USA Kent B. Monroe University of Illinois, USA Nelson Ndubisi Griffith University, Australia A. Parasuraman University of Miami, USA William Perreault University of North Carolina, USA Robert A. Peterson University of Texas, USA Nigel Piercy University of Warwick, UK Jagmohan S. Raju University of Pennsylvania, USA Vithala Rao Cornell University, USA Brian Ratchford University of Texas, USA Jagdish N. Sheth Emory University, USA Itamar Simonson Stanford University, USA David Stewart Loyola Marymount University, USA Rajan Varadarajan Texas A&M University, USA Stephen L. Vargo University of Hawaii, USA Michel Wedel University of Maryland, USA Book Chapters Shopper Marketing and the Role of In-Store Marketing Review of Marketing Research Shopper Marketing and the Role of In-Store Marketing Copyright Page List of Contributors List of Reviewers Editorial Advisory Board Series Introduction: Building Accumulated Knowledge and Focusing on Needed Research Volume Introduction: Shopper Marketing & In-Store Marketing: An Introduction Mobile Shopper Marketing: Assessing the Impact of Mobile Technology on Consumer Path to Purchase Tracing the Evolution & Projecting the Future of In-Store Marketing Six Lessons for In-Store Marketing from Six Years of Mobile Eye-Tracking Research The Shopper-Centric Retailer: Three Case Studies on Deriving Shopper Insights from Frequent Shopper Data How Do Marketing Actions and Customer Mindset Metrics Influence the Consumer’s Path to Purchase? Insights from In-Store Marketing Experiments Identifying the Drivers of Shopper Attention, Engagement, and Purchase Shopper Marketing 2.0: Opportunities and Challenges Previous Volume Contents

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.111
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.111
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0220.008
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0150.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2960.291

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207